Cases 21 - 30 of 900
USA v. Yvonne St Cyr
as 23-3174
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Yvonne St Cyr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cargill v. Barron
as 23-2246
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUINCETTA YVONNE CARGILL
Respondent / Appellee:
HOWARD C BARRON
United States of America v. Lattimore
as 23-2167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
YVONNE LATTIMORE
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Thomas Workman and Unknown Persons
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Rufina (Perla) Sanchez, Jasmine Martinez and others
Respondent:
Unknown Pesons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
IN RE: FRAGRANCE END-USER PLAINTIFF ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2023cv16127
Plaintiff:
MIRLINDA ELMAZI
Defendant:
DSM-FIRMENICH AG, FIRMENICH INTERNATIONAL SA, FIRMENICH INC. and others
In Re:
FRAGRANCE END-USER PLAINTIFF ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Consolidated Plaintiff:
YVONNE PEYCHAL
Interested Party:
ANDREA HOGAN, SANDRA KLUESSENDORF, MASEES SKENDERIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PEYCHAL v. DSM-FIRMENICH AG et al
as 2:2023cv16242
Plaintiff:
YVONNE PEYCHAL
Defendant:
DSM-FIRMENICH AG, FIRMENICH INTERNATIONAL SA, FIRMENICH INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wilmath v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv01837
Plaintiff:
Mario Wilmath
Defendant:
Daumeka Yvonne Lawson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
