Cases 31 - 40 of 1,393
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ceco Industrial Solutions, Inc. v. Yerkes
as 8:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ceco Industrial Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffery Yerkes
United States v. Jeffery Turner
as 24-1097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeffery Turner
USA v. Jeffery Forsythe
as 24-1054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFERY S. FORSYTHE
Pecoraro v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Aristotle Pecoraro
Defendant:
State of Washington and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Hayes v. County of Kern, et al.
as 24-193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HAYES, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF KERN, MARIO ROJAS, Deputy, JOCELYN WOLTERS and others
JEFFERY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02192
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JEFFERY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
USA v. Jeffery Acree
as 23-14226
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFERY LAMAR ACREE
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent:
Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court:
William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner:
CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
