Cases 31 - 40 of 743
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.
as 23-4419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, STATE OF ARIZONA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Matthew E Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2023cv10550
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeek Rewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. James Byrd
as 23-3021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES TARIC BYRD
In re: Christine Scott
as 23-13411
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINE SCOTT
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
United States v. Lewis Byrd, III
as 23-3297
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lewis Edward Byrd, III
BYRD v. GUILFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER- GREENSBORO and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PARNELL et al v. SCHOOL BOARD OF LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
PETER PARNELL, JUSTIN RICHARDSON, E D B and others
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA, DIANE KORNEGAY, MANNY DIAZ, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
