Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Gant v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 4:2019cv03537
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Gant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christina Acker v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-16638
Defendant:
MARK HERRING, SETH SABINSKY, TIMOTHY JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA JAY ACKER
United States v. Montecarlos Gant
as 19-2366
Defendant / Appellant:
Montecarlos Marteze Gant, also known as Lucky, also known as Cuzzo
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Gant v. The Swiss Colony, LLC
as 4:2019cv01347
Defendant:
The Swiss Colony, LLC d/b/a Direct Charge
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Gant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mullane v. Gants, et al
as 19-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MULLANE
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH D. GANTS, MAURA T. HEALEY, in both her individual and official capacity, MICHELE HOGAN and others
Michael Fuqua v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 19-15536
Defendant:
VAN DER NOORD, KIRKOFF, HUDSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HORN, Lieutenant, MOONEY, Deputy Warden, COCA, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Bishay, et al v. Supreme Court of MA, et al
as 19-1257
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORP., a/k/a Bank of America, N.A., JON FREEMAN, REAL ESTATE GROWTH FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY T. BISHAY and BAHIG F. BISHAY
Mullane v. Gants et al
as 1:2019cv10407
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mullane
Defendant:
Michele B Hogan, Maura Healey and Ralph D. Gants
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Lemar Gant v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 19-15265
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEMAR GANT
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr.
David Wilson v. California State Prison Corcor, et al
as 19-15237
Defendant / Appellee:
PATTEN, Supervising Correctional Cook I, D. OVERLEY, ADA Coordinator, R. TOLSON, Associate Warden Housing and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
