Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02125
Plaintiff: Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund, Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund, Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Seale et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2009mc10198
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Scott Seale and Jamie Adams Seale
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Glaxosmithkline, PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd. and others
Movant: Trustees of Boston University, Allen A. Mitchell, M.D., Carol Louik, Sc.D. and others
ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00730
Plaintiff: ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, USA
Cause Of Action: 73 U.S.C. § 201 Violation of the Pennsylvania Consumer Fraud Act, and all other Acts in the United States
United States of America ex. rel. et al v. Infomedics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv11775
Plaintiff: United States of America ex. rel. , State of California, State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Infomedics, Inc. , Glaxosmithkline, PLC and Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
State of California et al v. John Sedor et al
as 1:2008mc00040
Plaintiff: State of California and Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc.
Respondent: John Sedor
Defendant: Sandoz, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Amgen, Inc. and others
PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv02688
Plaintiff: PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: BIOVAIL CORPORATION, BIOVAIL LABORATORIES, INC., BIOVAIL LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL SRL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv02462
Plaintiff: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant: BIOVAIL CORPORATION, BIOVAIL LABORATORIES, INC., BIOVAIL LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL SRL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
MEIJER, INC. et al v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02431
Defendant: BIOVAIL CORPORATION , BIOVAIL LABORATORIES, INC. , BIOVAIL LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL SRL and others
Plaintiff: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Movant: ABRIKA, LLLP , ABRIKA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and ABRIKA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv01866
Petitioner: SAJ DISTRIBUTORS, INC., STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Respondent: SANDOZ, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Nancy Gerdts, etc., et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., et al
as 08-8002
Petitioner: Nancy Gerdts, individually and on behalf of minor A.G., Cindy Slavens, individually and for minor J.S., Alan Chilson and others
Respondent: SmithKline Beecham Corporation, doing business as GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKline, PLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?