Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 276
T.A. v. USDC-CALA
as 23-70059
Not Classified By Court: In re: T.A., a Disabled Adult, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Liana Harmandjian, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Erroneously Sued As County of Los Angeles, by and through The LA county Department of Children and Family Services and ADRIENNE M. ZACHERY
Petitioner: T.A., a Disabled Adult, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Liana Harmandjian
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Brian Kelley, et al v. AW & HO Holdings Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN KELLEY, ROBIN KELLEY, Individually and as Personal Representatives and General Co-Administrators of the Estate of J.K., their minor child, deceased, J. O., a Minor, Individually, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of H.H., deceased, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sara Schneider deceased, by and through his Co-Guardians Ad Litem and others
Defendant / Appellee: WALMART STORES EAST LLC, WALMART STORES EAST LP, WALMART STORES INC and others
Appellee: CRC INDUSTRIES INC
Aniel Cruz Enriquez et al v. Moke Espiriti, LLC, et al
as 2:2023cv02040
Plaintiff: Aniel Cruz Enriquez, Gabriel Santiago, Laura Enriquez Aguilar and others
Petitioner: Does 1 through 50, Inclusive
Defendant: Moke Espiriti, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company and Moke Espiritu, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
as 23-220
Plaintiff: Laurie Thomas, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Alison Kavulak, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jen MacLeod, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jordan White, Robert Partello, Erin Abdoo and others
Defendant / Appellee: Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. v. B.D.
as 22-8020
Petitioner: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Respondent: B. D., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, BRYAN MYERS
Lamm et al v. Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv01961
Plaintiff: Megan K. Lamm and Haley M. Lamm
Defendant: Judge Rosemarie A. Hall, Guardian ad Litem Nikki L. Reed, Attorney Susan J. Lax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
DOE et al v. JASPERSE
as 1:2022cv21466
Plaintiff: LILY DOE, HENLEY DOE, MAUREEN DOE and others
Defendant: CARL LEE JASPERSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
In re: Metcalf We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1506
Petitioner / Appellant: RON DAVID METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M. and CLAUDIA METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M
Not Yet Classified: D.J.M.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?