Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Boyd et al
as 5:2019cv00293
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
James V. Boyd, Diana Boyd, John Doe Entity d/b/a House of SIn and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
LOBACZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
as 1:2019cv00497
Plaintiff:
Frank M Lobacz and FRANK M. LOBACZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Medical and Other Staff John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dykstra et al v. Temple et al
as 4:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Marianne Dykstra, Neuse Breeze, LLC and Glen Dykstra
Defendant:
Calvin Williams, Sally L. Temple, Miki Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NC RSOL et al v. NODALSKI et al
as 1:2018cv00597
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA STEIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LORRIN FREEMAN, PATRICK NODALSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, NC RSOL and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. JAMES, ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00533
Defendant:
JOHN DOE ENTITY, ERIC B. JAMES, JOHN DOE ENTITY doing business as ROYAL LIFE VIP WELLNESS SPA & EVENT CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
