Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Michael Jones v. EDUC, et al
as 17-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:17-cv-00741
Plaintiff:
Janet Jones and Michael Jones
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
JONES v. U.S. DEPT OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION and DAVID DENATARIS
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 123
Federal Trade Commission v. Aaron Michael Jones et al
as 8:2017cv00058
Defendant:
Allorey, Inc., Audacity LLC, Data World Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
USA v. Keeyon Jone
as 16-50499
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEEYON MICHAEL JONES, AKA Johnny Jones, AKA Keeynon Michael Jones, AKA Keeyon Jones
Michael Jones v. EDUC, et al
as 16-4015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CrossFit, Inc. v. Mustapha
as 16-1987
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CROSSFIT, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
DONNY MUSTAPHA, individually and, d/b/a Chelmsford Sports Club, RONNIE BRIERE, individually and, d/b/a CrossFit Objective, CHRIS COOPER, individually and as Regional Media Director for CrossFit, Inc., d/b/a CrossFit Catalyst and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2016cv06177
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
