Cases 31 - 40 of 333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Roshanak Khadem
as 22-50277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROSHANAK KHADEM, AKA Roxanne Khadem, AKA Roxy Khadem
Sundaram v. Freshworks Inc et al
as 3:2022cv06750
Plaintiff:
MOHAN R. SUNDARAM and Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
FRESHWORKS INC, RATHNA GIRISH MATHRUBOOTHAM, TYLER SLOAT and others
Petitioner:
Vivek Nagarajan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
USA v. Roshanak Khadem
as 22-50245
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSHANAK KHADEM, AKA Roxanne Khadem, AKA Roxy Khadem
ADKINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00869
Petitioner:
ROXANNE ADKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00842
Plaintiff:
Adams, Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Treppel Family Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Abbvie Inc. v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2022cv02718
Plaintiff:
Treppel Family Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Abbvie Inc.
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Michael E. Severino, Robert A. Michael and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Roxanne McGladeIn re: Roxanne McGlade
as 22-1372
Petitioner:
In re: ROXANNE MCGLADE, aka Roxanne Harper
David Webb v. USDC-WAWTA
as 22-70079
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HELATH SERVICES, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Petitioner:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
