Cases 31 - 40 of 43
George B. Lannom v. Stephen K. Wild
as 3:2012mc00051
Petitioner:
George B. Lannom
Respondent:
Stephen K. Wild
United States of America v. Edwards
as 2:2011mc03091
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Stephen K Edwards
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 11-10261
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson, AKA Steven K. Wilson
Kleinhelter v. Hege et al
as 3:2011mc00007
Petitioner:
Brian Kleinhelter
Respondent:
Stephen K. Hege and Linda S. Hege
Crawford v. Rea et al
as 3:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Crawford
Defendant:
William J. Rea, Jr., Timothy J. Vanden Heuvel, Knox Attorney Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown, et al v. SC State, et al
as 2:2000cv03215
Plaintiff:
Richard E Blackburn, Tom Clark, Kather Gray and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina , Charles Condon , South Carolian Legislature and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 09-10394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Steven K. Wilson, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson
USA v. Stefan Wilson
as 09-10330
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEFAN ANDRE WILSON, AKA Steven K. Wilson, AKA Stefan A. Wilson, AKA Stephen K. Wilson
Movant - Appellant:
RICHARD A. GRAY, Jr., GRAY INVESTMENT PARTNERS and CUMBERLAND HILL CAPITAL FUND, LP
In re: Stephen Eugster, Esq.
as 09-80108
Respondent:
In re: STEPHEN K. EUGSTER, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: May 11, 1998,
Alphas Company of New York, Inc. et al v. Lerro Produce Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv06183
Plaintiff:
Alphas Company of New York, Inc., Coosemans of New York, Inc. and Fireman Produce Exchange Inc.
Defendant:
Lerro Produce Corp. and Stephen K. Lerro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
