Cases 31 - 40 of 778
Hooper v. McDonough
as 24-1262
Claimant:
SETH HOOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Gilardy v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gilardy
Defendant:
Ethan Brown, Mark J. Nelson, Phillip E. Hardin and others
Nominal Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
Cosmographic Software LLC v. Franklin
as 2:2023cv13052
Plaintiff:
Cosmographic Software LLC
Defendant:
Seth Franklin
McLaughlin v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 23-3724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - DISTRICT OF OREGON and others
Greenhouse v. Website Symmetry et al
as 1:2023cv09754
Plaintiff:
Albert Greenhouse
Defendant:
Website Symmetry, Video Symmetry, Logo Symmetry and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ghostwriting Universe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 3:2023cv01905
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seth Hannibal-Fisher, et al v. Grand Canyon University
as 23-80081
Petitioner:
SETH HANNIBAL-FISHER and DAVID TRAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY, a domestic nonprofit corporation
Abaho et al v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:23-CV-02743
Plaintiff:
Fenekansi Abaho, Vitson Abaasa, Nathan Abaho and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
