Cases 31 - 40 of 389
Appel v. Wolf
as 1:2021mi00062
Respondent:
Robert S. Wolf, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and SunTrust Bank
Petitioner:
Howard Appel
Rossi Wade v. Truist Bank
as 21-1570
Defendant / Appellee:
MAURICE STEWARD, Branch Manager, JODI MEADOWS, Operations Manager, THOMAS N. THOMPSON, Member, Truist Bank Board of Directors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSSI WADE, & DAUGHTER (JANE DOE)
HANKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv01066
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION SERVICE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS, WEST COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Sanders v. Truist Bank
as 21-5378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL C. SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST BANK, dba SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mary Nealy v. SunTrust Bank, et al
as 21-11358
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK and SUNTRUST BANK, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY NEALY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Flordeliza Hawkins v. Court of Common Pleas
as 21-1167
Defendant / Appellee:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA, SUNTRUST BANK and JOSEPH PARTAIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FLORDELIZA A. HAWKINS
Michael Sherman, et al v. Shirley Sherrod, et al
as 21-1246
Intervenor / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK, nka Truist Bank and SUNTRUST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D., P.C., a Michigan professional corporation and SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, D.O., P.C., dba Physician Eye Care Associates of Garden City and MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, D.O.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
