Cases 31 - 40 of 105
Wilnick Dorval v. Sapphire Village Condominium A, et al
as 20-1681
Defendant:
BERNARD M. VANSLUYTMAN, MICHELE LANGE, RICHARD W. O'DELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SIDNEY JARVIS, JONATHON MORGAN, MADLON JENKINS-RUDZIAK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILNICK DORVAL
United States of America v. Whyte
as 20-313
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Whyte, AKA Jak Mac
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
Darrell Whyte v. USA
as 19-5682
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL WHYTE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martin v. Tier Reit, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01292
Defendant:
Christie B Kelly, Richard I. Gilchrist, Dennis J Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Martin
USA v. Rodney Lavalais
as 19-30161
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY LAVALAIS, also known as Whyte Lavalais
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nassau County and Parking Violation Agency et al v. Whyte
as 2:2018cv05319
Plaintiff:
Nassau County and Parking Violation Agency, Nassau NY Photo Enforcment Division and The State of New York
Defendant:
Jovanni Giuseppe Whyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violation Agency v. Whyte
as 2:2018cv04626
Plaintiff:
Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violation Agency
Defendant:
Jovanni Guiseppe Whyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
