Cases 41 - 50 of 363
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Bradford Emergency Group, LLC et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv62139
Plaintiff:
Bradford Emergency Group, LLC, Columbia Emergency Group, LLC, Duval Emergency Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc. doing business as Florida Blue and Health Options, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Woody, et al v. John Halferty, et al
as 21-3257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Woody, Kendra Jackson, L.W. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
John Halferty, Jasper County Sheriff, Jacob Halferty, Marc Headdington and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Shon Latty v. Polk County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 21-35794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHON LATTY
Defendant / Appellee:
POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, a department of Polk County, POLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, a department of Polk County and AARON FELTON
David Getzen v. J. Long, et al
as 21-16437
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID GETZEN
Defendant / Appellant:
J. LONG
Defendant:
COUNTY OF YAVAPAI, STATE OF ARIZONA, YAVAPAI COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Maurice Polk v. Marcus Pollard
as 21-71220
Petitioner:
MAURICE ROGERS POLK
Respondent:
MARCUS POLLARD, Warden
US v. Brandon Polk
as 21-4376
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Hillary Polk v. Glendale Manor Enterprises
as 21-16119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HILLARY CHARLES POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENDALE MANOR ENTERPRISES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
