Cases 41 - 50 of 734
Ahmad MiltonIn re: Ahmad Milton
as 23-11949
Petitioner:
In re: AHMAD MILTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Alolabi et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2023cv02550
Plaintiff:
LINA ALOLABI, MHD FIRAS ALAHMADI, AYAH AL BUNI and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, San Francisco Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Ramel Harris
as 23-4336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMEL AHMAD HARRIS
Ahmad v. Garland
as 23-60241
Petitioner:
Munir Ahmad
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Ahmad
as 23-10465
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Fahd Naeem Ahmad, also known as Fahd Ahmad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Toye Tutis
as 23-1796
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TOYE TUTIS, a/k/a "AHMAD", a/k/a "MAHD", a/k/a "SANTANA"
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Ahmad et al
as 1:2022cv06713
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Riaz Ahmad, M.D., Community Medical Care of N.Y., P.C., Comfort Care Medical PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
