Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
In re Payment Card Interchange
as 12-4765
Plaintiff: Coborn's Incorporated, D'Agostino Supermarkets, National Restaurant Association and others
Petitioner: Robersons Fine Jewelry, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiffs in civil action Jetro Holding, Inc. et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al 05-cv-4520 JG-JO, Plaintiffs in civil action National Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al 05-cv-4521 JG-JO, Plaintiffs in civil action Supervalu Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. et al 05-cv-4650 JG-JO and others
Defendant - Appellee: Defendants in civil action Jetro Holding, Inc. et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al 05-cv-4520 JG-JO, Defendants in civil actionNational Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al 05-cv-4521 JG-JO, Defendants in civil action Supervalu Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. et al 05-cv-4650 JG-JO and others
Intervenor: American Express and Mary Watson
Objector: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Objector - Appellant: Target Corporation, Macys, Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and others
United States v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.
as 1:2011cv02103
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc.
Movant: Maryland Office of the State Treasurer
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
United States v. American Express Co. et al
as 1:2011cv02101
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: American Express Co. and American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc.
Movant: The University of Maryland, College Park
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
United States v. American Express Co. et al
as 1:2011cv02100
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: American Express Co. and American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc.
Movant: Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00371
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00467
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00645
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party: Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court: Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff: Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner: Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant: Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader: MNZ Inc
Respondent: Visa Inc.
Intervenor: Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant: Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff: Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant: St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?