Cases 41 - 50 of 2,212
Childers et al v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bailey Childers and Luqman Muhammad
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc. d/b/a Life Protect 24/7
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Deon Bailey
as 24-2124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Bailey v. Oregon State Treasurer
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Charles Bailey
Defendant:
Oregon State Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Koch et al v. Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education, Pleasant Hill R-III School District, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
BAILEY v. LCIJ, INC.
as 2:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ANNETTE BAILEY
Defendant:
LCIJ, INC. doing business as NATIONAL TENANT NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson et al v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson, Nicole Price, Narene Crosby and others
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Andrew Bailey, Jay Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2896
Plaintiff:
DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bailey v. Olympia Union Gospel Mission, et al.
as 24-2851
Plaintiff:
JARED J. BAILEY
Defendant:
OLYMPIA UNION GOSPEL MISSION, OLYMPIA UNION GOSPEL MISSION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, LOREN STEFFEN, Executive Director, CEO also known as Skip Steffen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
