Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Marilyn Gillespie, et al v. Benton Investments & Associate, et al
as 12-8028
Respondent:
Marilyn Gillespie, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Rachel Beavers, deceased and Patsy Padgett, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Cleo Brod, deceased
Petitioner:
Benton Investments & Associates, LLC, doing business as Grace Healthcare of Benton, Benton Property Investments, LLC, Maumelle Investments & Associates, LLC, doing business as Grace Healthcare of Maumelle and others
PEARSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PEARSON , J. P. , CLEO MOSLEY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
WASHINGTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01544
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ANTHONY DAY and SHALANA MCCOMMONS
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WASHINGTON , M. W. , CHANTAL MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2012cv00663
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jane Doe , John Doe , Cynthia D. Kinser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. Educational Employees Credit Union et al
as 5:2012cv03272
Plaintiff:
Irene Ramirez
Defendant:
Educational Employees Credit Union, Cleo Bauer-Papagni, Rick Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Cleo Dale
as 11-5628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLEO DALE
Cleo Flowers, et al. v. Ac&s, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-60467
Plaintiff:
Cleo Flowers
Defendant:
Ac&s, Inc
MOSELY et al v. ACHIEVEMENT PREPARATORY ACADEMY PCS
as 1:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
CLEO MOSELY and STACY WILKINS
Defendant:
ACHIEVEMENT PREPARATORY ACADEMY PCS
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Fulton v. The Kroger Company et al
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Cleo Jeanine Fulton and Cleo Jeanine Fulton
Defendant:
The Kroger Company and L. J. Coleman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
