Cases 41 - 50 of 2,279
Davison, et al v. CIR
as 24-9000
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLEN R. DAVISON and SHARON L. DAVISON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Humbolt Investments, LLC v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1037
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBOLT INVESTMENTS, LLC
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cardulla v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-31
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD JOHN CARDULLA
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
3M Company v. CIR
as 23-3772
Appellant:
3M Company, and Subsidiaries
Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Danielle Biton v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 23-1349
Petitioner / Appellant:
Danielle Biton
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Avery v. CIR
as 23-9004
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES W. AVERY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Estate of Richard D. Spizzirri, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-14049
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESTATE OF RICHARD D. SPIZZIRRI, DECEASED
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Seggerman v. United States Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-8034
Petitioner:
HENRY SEGGERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
