Cases 41 - 50 of 604
Wheeler v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael Dee and others
United States v. Stang
as 22-4125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOE DEE STANG
Carlisle v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10720
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael Dee and others
O'Dell v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10211
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael E. Dee and others
In Re Wells Fargo Collateral Protection Insurance Litigation
as 8:2017ml02797
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Auto Insurance Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Liaison Counsel for Defendants, NATIONAL GENERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Gene Conklin, Bryan Tidwell and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tianna Membreno
Amicus Curiae:
Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General, State of Arizona and Attorneys General of Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska and Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Robby Kesler
as 22-3231
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robby Dee Kesler
US v. John Dugger
as 22-4596
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN DEE DUGGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Zachary Lopez
as 22-13036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ZACHARY DEE LOPEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
