Cases 41 - 50 of 288
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01845
Defendant:
Fiesta Mart, LLC
Plaintiff:
Vanina Elisa Jimenez Esquivel and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Rodney Bell, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Raby, James Hogan, Stanley Tackett and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Santiago Esquivel v. Gary Miniard
as 21-1525
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY MINIARD, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANTIAGO ESQUIVEL
Yuba County Water Agency v. Sobeck et al
as 2:2021cv00861
Defendant:
Tam M Doduc, Eileen Sobeck, California State Water Resources Control Board and others
Plaintiff:
Yuba County Water Agency
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Nevada Irrigation District v. Sobeck, et al.
as 2:2021cv00851
Defendant:
Tam M Doduc, EILEEN SOBECK, California State Water Resources Control Board and others
Plaintiff:
Nevada Irrigation District
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Todd Ashker, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-15839
Defendant / Appellant:
GREG LEWIS, Warden, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, ANTHONY CHAUS, Chief, Office of Correctional Safety, CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. REDD, Jr., GABRIEL RALPH REYES, GEORGE RUIZ and others
Esquivel-Garcia v. Garland
as 21-6256
Petitioner:
DANIEL ESQUIVEL-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alfredo Lopez-Esquivel v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3325
Petitioner:
ALFREDO LOPEZ-ESQUIVEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jamal Hendrix v. M. Sharp, et al
as 21-15358
Defendant / Appellee:
ELLIOT BURLEIGH, H. CHUNG, C. DAVIS, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX, AKA Jamar Hendrix
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
