Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Tesemma et al v. Evans
as 0:2009cv02744
Plaintiff:
Tigist Tesemma, Tigist Tesemma, Lawrence Smith and others
Defendant:
Gwynne Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Type:
Other Statutes
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gwynn Hudspeth v. Abco Industries, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-71811
Plaintiff:
Gwynn Hudspeth
Defendant:
Abco Industries, Inc
Williams et al v. CMG Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gwynn Williams and Sangita Williams
Defendant:
CMG Mortgage, Inc., Countrywide Document Custody Services, A Division of Treasury Bank, N. A., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Donte Gwynn
as 08-4554
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONTE GWYNN
Lanson et al v. The Florida Bar et al
as 9:2008cv80422
Plaintiff:
Meryl Lanson, Mary Alice Gwynn and Mary Alice Gwynn, P.A.
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, John Harkness, John Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
