Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 532
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Freedman v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv03093
Plaintiff: Robert Freedman
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., James Dimon and Daniel E. Pinto
Iosilevich v. MSC Cruises (USA) et al
as 1:2022cv01897
Plaintiff: FELIKS IOSILEVICH BY POA ILYA FELIKSOVICH IOSILEVICH and Feliks Iosilevich
Defendant: MSC CRUISES (USA), MSC CRUISES S.A., RICHARD SASSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022mc00053
Plaintiff: City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00049
Plaintiff: City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent: Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner: The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff: City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Justin Falahi v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv09449
Plaintiff: Justin Falahi
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase and Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?