Cases 41 - 50 of 1,081
Jibreel v. Chin et al
as 3:2013cv03470
Plaintiff:
Adam Jibreel
Defendant:
Hock Seng Chin, Pete King, Patty Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anhalt v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2013cv05279
Plaintiff:
Nadiya Byambasuren Anhalt
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas and Ruth Dorochoff
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nyuwa v. Field Office Director et al
as 3:2013cv01275
Respondent:
Administrative Appeals Office, Field Office Director, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Jeremy A. Nyuwa
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Juan Rincon Herrera v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary
as 13-60514
Petitioner:
JUAN ERNESTO RINCON HERRERA
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Nieto v. Holder et al
as 0:2013cv61578
Plaintiff:
Lucas Nieto
Defendant:
Eric Holder , Janet Napolitano , Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NAWAZ et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2013cv04187
Plaintiff:
RHONDA EILEEN NAWAZ , MUHAMMAD NAWAZ , HASSAN MUDASSAR and others
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and TONY BRYSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Khalil v. Holder, et al
as 1:2013mc00486
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Mohamad Khalil
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gjondrekaj v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
Rozarta Gjondrekaj
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and Gregory Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
