Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 711
Schottenstein, M.D. et al v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01197
Plaintiff: Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, M.D., Thompson Real Estate, LLC, Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC d/b/a NY Spine Medicine and others
Defendant: Derek Lee, Pearl Chan, Kong H Chan and others
Counter Defendant: Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Human v. Call Trader, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00843
Plaintiff: Daniel Human
Defendant: Call Trader, LLC doing business as TheHealthScout.com, Brook Whitmore, Shivani Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Prosser v. Glo Tanning Centers, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00768
Plaintiff: Christopher Prosser
Defendant: Glo Tanning Centers, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1 through 3
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dennis et al v. NW Relocation, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00223
Plaintiff: Warren Dennis and Joyce Dennis
Defendant: NW Relocation, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1- 10
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Walla Walla County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46010
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Walla Walla County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45955
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Franklin County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45944
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Franklin County
Intervenor Defendant: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whitman County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46009
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Whitman County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pierce County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45195
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Municipality of Bayamon et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01550
Plaintiff: Bayamon, Caguas, Loiza and others
Defendant: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Shell PLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?