Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Red Lion Area School District v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00428
Defendant:
James Monsees, Adam Bowen, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Red Lion Area School District
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ATTERBURY v. EARN COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
CASEY OLIVERA, NAKIA RATTRAY, DONNELL MORRIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA ATTERBURY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GOODEN v. WALTON et al
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
AARON WALTON, EPCOT CRENSHAW, THOMAS S. MULLER and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06523
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, JOHN DOES 1-100, HOYOUNG HUH and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06475
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., JAMES MONSEES, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
RINGGOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01989
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
RINGGOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PENNCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00364
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
PENNCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WOODLAND HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC, et al
as 2:2020cv01990
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, JUUL LABS, INC,, ADAM BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
WOODLAND HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01984
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
