Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Cary et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2016mc00093
Plaintiff:
Mark K Cary and Paula Cary
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
ARNESS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00387
Marie-Dessisso El Bey et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv05152
Defendant:
Craig K. Beideman, Esq., Mark K. Broyles, Esq., David P. Case, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Kemel-Dessisso: Bey and Marie-Dessisso: El Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elec Employees Pension Fund v. Mark Tonnesen
as 15-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PHILLIPS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK K. TONNESEN and KENNETH W. JONES
Defendant:
TRIAD GUARANTY, INC.
Trina Bender, et al v. Julie Logan, et al
as 14-3647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRINA L. BENDER and MARK K. BENDER
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE LOGAN, SCOTT D. LOGAN, BERG DMI, LLC and others
BNSF Railway v. Home Oil Stations et al
as 3:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Home Oil Stations, Incorporated, Baker Oil Corporation and Mark K. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Lipin v. Hunt et al
as 1:2014cv01081
Plaintiff:
Joan C. Lipin
Defendant:
David E. Hunt, Danske Bank , Bergquist Advokatbyra AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BNSF Railway Company v. Home Oil Stations, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Home Oil Stations, Incorporated, Baker Oil Corporation and Mark K. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Adkins, et al. v. Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund, Inc., et al.
as 2:2013cv02843
Plaintiff:
Gerald Adkins , John Barringer, Earl Bentz and others
Defendant:
Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund, Inc, RMK High Income Fund, Inc, RMK Strategic Income Fund, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
