Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,749
USA v. Mendez
as 24-40027
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Eligio Mendez
Brown, et al v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, et al
as 24-8001
Respondent: KEVIN BROWN, individually and as natural parent and next friend of G.B. and D.B., CHRISTOPHER BLUNDON, individually and as natural parent and next friend of A.B. and Z.B., THERESA BROWN, individually and as natural parent and next friend of G.B. and D.B. and others
Plaintiff: ADAM W. DYER, BRIAN MENDEZ, individually and as natural parent and personal represenative for M.M., BRENDA MORSE and others
Petitioner: SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION and GWENAEL BUSNEL
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-5
Mendez-Echevarria v. US
as 23-2093
Petitioner: RAYMOND MENDEZ-ECHEVARRIA
Respondent: UNITED STATES
USA v. Ernesto Mendez-Lopez
as 23-6113
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ERNESTO MENDEZ-LOPEZ
Mendez v. Pretium Mortgage Credit Partners
as 23-8057
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARMEN L. MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee: PRETIUM MORTGAGE CREDIT PARTNERS, PRETIUM MORTGAGE CREDIT MANAGEMENT, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB and others
Guerrero Mendez v. Garland
as 23-4246
Petitioner: GERARDO GUERRERO MENDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lee v. Guayara et al
as 0:2023cv62362
Plaintiff: Bernice C Lee and Bernice Lee
Defendant: Bryant Guayara, DaVibezCreations LLC, M5 Store LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Jose Mendez-Guevara v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2291
Petitioner: JOSE ARCIDES MENDEZ-GUEVARA, CLELIA ARACELY RIVERA-RAMIREZ, JOSE FERNANDO MENDEZ-RIVERA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Mendez v. Cisneros
as 23-4142
Petitioner: EDGAR NOE MENDEZ
Respondent: THERESA CISNEROS
Perez-Mendez v. Garland
as 23-3939
Petitioner: JEFFREY EDGARDO PEREZ-MENDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?