Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diego Rivera Valencia v. Lau et al
as 2:2017cv09263
Defendant:
Mr. Lau, Other Unknown Individuals and Felicia Ponce
Plaintiff:
Diego Rivera Valencia
Ronald Piche v. Erica Miller et al
as 5:2017cv02125
Defendant:
Alphonso Allen, Does, Erica Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Piche
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 17-35662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE, for itself and as parens patriae
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL LACOUNTE, LOUISE REYES, NORMA GOURNEAU and others
EDGE INVESTMENT, LLC v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv00621
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DC WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY , UNKNOWN DC WATER CO-CONSPIRATOR NO. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
EDGE INVESTMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 16-36049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE, for itself and as parens patriae
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL LACOUNTE, LOUISE REYES, NORMA GOURNEAU and others
Meekey v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv09932
Plaintiff:
Toni Meekey
Defendant:
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, JP Morgan Chase & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dale Adams v. DOJ, et al
as 16-41138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. LaCounte et al
as 1:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Northern Arapaho Tribe
Defendant:
Darryl LaCounte , Louise Reyes , Norma Gourneau and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
