Cases 41 - 50 of 383
In re: Belanger
as 21-8003
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Respondent:
LISA SIEGEL BELANGER
In re: Syngenta (Shields Law)
as 21-3021
Appellant:
PAUL BYRD LAW FIRM, PLLC and SHIELDS LAW GROUP, LLC
Appellee:
CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., HENINGER GARRISON DAVIS, LLC, STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP and others
In re: Syngenta Toups/Coffman
as 21-3020
Appellant:
THOMAS P. CALHOUN, III, RICHARD L. COFFMAN, P.C., THOMPSON, GARRETT & HINES and others
Appellee:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. and others
In re: Syngenta Hossley-Embry
as 21-3022
Appellee:
SHAMBERG JOHNSON & BERGMAN, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C., GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC and others
Appellant:
HOSSLEY-EMBRY, LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Martin v. Salem Police Department, et al
as 21-1004
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH H. TURIEL, ELAINE MILO, ARTHUR C. SARENT, III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD B. MARTIN, JR.
Weaver v. Siegel
as 21-18
Defendant / Appellee:
Roger E. Siegel, Esq., Darrell Parker, Sophia Maloney, AKA Sophia Alleyne and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Everette Weaver
In re: Syngenta AG MIR 162
as 20-3257
Petitioner / Appellant:
RACHEL KELLOGG, STRINGER FARMS, INC., BROMLEY RANCH, LLC and others
Appellee:
FRANCISCO GUERRA, WOJTALEWICZ LAW FIRM, LTD., DEWALD DEAVER, P.C., LLO and others
Philip Siegel v. Mark Goldstein, et al
as 20-3550
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SMITH, DMD, DELAWARE VALLEY MAXILLOFACIAL AND ORAL SURGERY PC, JOSEPH P. MULLIGAN, DMD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP T. SIEGEL, DDS
Philip Siegel v. Mark Goldstein, et al
as 20-3547
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SMITH, DMD, DELAWARE VALLEY MAXILLOFACIAL AND ORAL SURGERY PC, JOSEPH P. MULLIGAN, DMD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP T. SIEGEL, DDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
