Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Davis v. Nebraska Furniture Mart, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2011cv02559
Plaintiff:
James T. Davis
Defendant:
Nebraska Furniture Mart, Inc., Evans & Mullinix, P.A. and Jo Ann Butaud
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charles Davis v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-70399
:
In re: CHARLES T. DAVIS
Petitioner:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
RONALD GEORGE, Chief Justice
USA v. Antoine Davi
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-11152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTOINE T DAVIS
In re: Berryhill
as 10-7053
Petitioner:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
Gilmore, et al v. People of California
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:1966cv45878
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Gilmore, Jr. , Inmates of San Quentin State Prison and Willie Wisely
Defendant:
People of California
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Charles T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. Keona Davis
as 09-5468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEONA T. DAVIS
USA v. Keona Davis
as 09-5467
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEONA T. DAVIS
Charles Davis v. James Yate
as 08-73219
Petitioner:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Respondent:
JAMES YATES, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.