Cases 41 - 50 of 89
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2015mc00005
Petitioner:
RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
James Lee Pinkerton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2015cv00054
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Parole Commission and United States Probation Dept.
Petitioner:
James Lee Pinkerton
West v. Tripp et al
as 3:2014cv00690
Plaintiff:
Gary Emerson West
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, United States Corporation Company, United States District Court for the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Tripp et al
as 3:2014cv00689
Plaintiff:
Reginald Allen Jackson
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, United States Corporation Company, Superior Court of the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Short v. Tripp et al
as 3:2014cv00687
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lamont Short
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, United States Corporation Company, Superior Court of the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Bender v. U. S. Parole Commission
as 14-60656
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BENDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
In re: Lamar Coleman
as 14-3667
Petitioner:
In re: LAMAR COLEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Nominal Respondent:
WILLIAM J. NEALON, JR.
Michael Jackson v. USDC-WAWSE
as 14-71545
:
In re: MICHAEL E. JACKSON
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and JACK FOX, Warden
In re: Mark Robert
as 14-2071
Petitioner:
In re: MARK ROBERTS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
David Turner, Jr. v. United States Parole Commissi
as 14-5079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lewis Turner, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
