Cases 41 - 50 of 4,388
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Lora Sambrano v. Garland
as 24-865
Petitioner:
KATHERIN PILAR LORA SAMBRANO, PEDRO ARMANDO TORRES CORONEL and FABIAN MOISES TORRES LORA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Luis Algarin-Torres
as 24-1589
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LUIS ALGARIN-TORRES
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
United States of America v. Ramirez
as 24-1872
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROGELIO TORRES RAMIREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TORRES-PEREYRA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00198
Petitioner:
LUIS TORRES-PEREYRA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
