Cases 41 - 50 of 545
In re: George Pitts, Jr.
as 22-11547
Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE W PITTS, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
PITTS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00318
Petitioner:
BRANDIE C. PITTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Kenneth Pitts v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 22-1583
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections and State of Arkansas
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. harlow hospitality et al
as 2:2022cv10370
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
harlow hospitality, Jason Pitts and harlow hospitality Doing business as Great Lakes Sports Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re Ex Parte Application of Nouvel, LLC
as 2:2022mc00004
Petitioner:
NOUVEL, LLC
Respondent:
Mondo Bongo, LLC, William Bradley Pitt and Warren Grant
In Re:
Ex Parte Application of Nouvel, LLC
Melvin Robertson v. Raphael Warnock, et al
as 21-14481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPHAEL G. WARNOCK, SONNY PERDUE, Individual and Official Capacity, THURBERT BAKER, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Eugene Pitts v. Dexter Payne
as 21-3836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Issac Pitts
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Kyle Sholtis v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 21-3253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KYLE SHOLTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MAG PITT LP, DBA Cheerleaders
Defendant / Appellant:
MATHEW TURKO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
