Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Wilbert Smith v. Warden
as 19-10272
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILBERT JAMES SMITH
Rooney et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11970
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Sorresse, Sr., Kim Scheffold Stiefel, Layla Shajahan and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Schlissel et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv05331
Plaintiff:
Laurence Schlissel , Jude Laspa , Bruce Seeliger and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Jose Diaz et al
as 2:2018cv05145
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Jose Diaz, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Clearcapital.com, Inc. v. Computershare Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv00817
Defendant:
James Smith, Computershare, Inc. and Computershare Property Solutions LLC a Delaware LLC doing business as Property Solutions, Part of the Computershare Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Computershare Property Solutions LLC
Plaintiff:
Clearcapital.com, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Duane Andrews
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
United States of America v. Smith
as 18-612
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edwin Corniel, Mario Sanchez, AKA Tico and Leivy Ulerio
Defendant - Appellant:
James Smith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Jose Diaz
as 2:2018cv00051
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, DOES, Jose Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings, LLC
Smith v. Alliance CAS, LLC
as 6:2017cv02130
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Alliance CAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
