Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Trinidad-Maldonado v. Adams, et al
as 19-1982
Defendant / Appellee:
SAM ADAMS, MD, CHP, ALL BOP STAFF, KEITH OLSON, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS TRINIDAD-MALDONADO
Marc Hall v. M. Inch
as 19-7252
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN RUPSKA, LIEUTENANT LOYD, CAPTAIN WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee:
DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE SASAKI
Anthony Bussie v. BOP Secretary
as 19-7083
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMERCE SECRETARY and BOP SECRETARY
Anthony Bussie v. BOP Secretary
as 19-7085
Respondent / Appellee:
CONGRESS SECRETARY, EDNC JUDGE and BOP SECRETARY
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6099
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Hugh Hurwitz, et al
as 19-35512
Defendant / Appellee:
HUGH J. HURWITZ, BOP Director, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, Deputy Attorney General and JOSIAS SALAZAR, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Morgan v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6088
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
David Williams, Jr. v. DOJ, et al
as 19-16077
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLEY HARRINGTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID VERDEN WILLIAMS, Jr.
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
