Cases 51 - 60 of 79
GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA v. NORTON et al
as 1:2002cv02057
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF MANITOBA and STATE OF MISSOURI
Defendant:
JOHN W. KEYS , MARYANNE C. BACH , DENNIS E. BREITZMAN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Amicu:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA , SOUTH DAKOTA WILDLIFE FEDERATION , MINNESOTA CONSERVATION FEDERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Browning-Fote et al v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Catherine Browning-Fote and Jack P. Fote, SR.
Defendant:
Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C., Dennis E. Henry, Capital One Bank (USA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennis E. Vance v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00383
Defendant:
President R. K. Arnold, CEO Sanjiv Das, Cal Western Reconveyance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Vance
Juan M Achan et al v. Los Angeles City of et al
as 2:2004cv04334
Plaintiff:
Juan M Achan, Daniel P Ackley, Stephen R Addleman and others
Defendant:
Defendant City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03694
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03054
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Ross Shade, et al v. Ronald George, et al
as 09-16346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS S. SHADE and ESTATE OF MARY C. SHADE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Judge, WILLIAM C. VICKERY, in his capacity as Administrative Director of Courts, MARY M. ROBERTS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
