Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,539
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner: NATHAN HILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Juan Padrone Chavez v. Jimmy Gomez et al
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff: Juan Padrone Chavez
Defendant: Jimmy Gomez, Govening Local Body, Dispute Resolution Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant: ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Maria Felipe-Gomez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3214
Petitioner: MARIA CRISTINA FELIPE-GOMEZ and DENISSE YULEIDI FELIPE-GOMEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Ana Reyes-De Gomez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1210
Petitioner: ANA LILIAN REYES-DE GOMEZ and T.G.R.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Gomez Rivera v. Garland
as 24-1380
Petitioner: JULIO GOMEZ RIVERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1340
Petitioner: JUANITA AZUCENA RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ and ALEJANDRA S.A. LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez-Palchazaca v. Garland
as 24-497
Petitioner: MARIA GOMEZ-PALCHAZACA and DAYANA SARI-GOMEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez v. Gomez
as 4:2024cv00754
Petitioner: Eduardo Padilla Gomez
Defendant: Monserrat Armas Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11607 Int'l Child Abduction Act
Flores De Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1020
Petitioner: FABIOLA STEPHANIE FLORES DE GOMEZ, ASHLEY ALEXANDRA GOMEZ FLORES and ARLETTE SARAHI GOMEZ FLORES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?