Cases 51 - 60 of 105
McCurdy v. Fifth Third Mortgage Corp et al
as 1:2014cv03645
Plaintiff:
Adam McCurdy
Defendant:
Fifth Third Mortgage Corp and Safe Guard Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ann DeSouza v. JP Morgan Chase Home Lending, et al
as 14-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANN MARIE DESOUZA
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE HOME LENDING DIVISION and MCCURDY & CANDLER, LLC
Ann DeSouza v. JPMorgan Chase Home Lending D, et al
as 14-10708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANN MARIE DESOUZA
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE HOME LENDING DIVISION and MCCURDY & CANDLER, LLC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MCCURDY
as 1:2014mc00002
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUTH L. MCCURDY
DeSouza v. JP Morgan Chase Home Lending Division et al
as 1:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie DeSouza
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Home Lending Division and McCurdy Candler, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DeSouza v. JP Morgan Chase Home Lending Division et al
as 2:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie DeSouza
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Home Lending Division and McCurdy Candler LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCurdy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22014
Plaintiff:
Cindy McCurdy and David McCurdy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Chaiken et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as ILN/1:13-cv-04800
Plaintiff:
Irwin Chaiken , Carol Chaiken , Anna S Acosta and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc. and Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation v. MTS Associates of Londonderry, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00300
Defendant:
David E. McCurdy Trust, MTS Associates of Londonderry, LLC and David E. McCurdy
Plaintiff:
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
