Cases 51 - 60 of 190
Gottlieb et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00623
Plaintiff:
Lorna Chand, Andy Gottlieb, Jason W. Bartlett and others
Defendant:
Denise Merrill, Ned Lamont and Democratic State Central Committee
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Robert Halstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS HOLDINGS S. R.L. et al v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN
as 1:2020cv01081
Petitioner:
WATKINS HOLDINGS S. R.L., WATKINS (NED) B.V. and WATKINS HOLDINGS S.A R.L.
Respondent:
KINGDOM OF SPAIN
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Valentina Johnson v. John Wetmore, et al
as 20-11580
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAYSON HUGHES, VICTORIA FLETCHER and JOHN WETMORE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALENTINA NED JEAN JOHNSON
Urso v. Lamont
as 3:2020cv00529
Plaintiff:
Lindy Robert Urso
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Libertarian Party of Connecticut et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00467
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Denise Merrill
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale, Libertarian Party of Connecticut and Harold Harris
Petitioner:
Ethan Alcorn
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Michael Telesca, Kyle Kenley Kopitke and The Independent Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimberly Brink et al v. Ethan Brown et al
as 2:2020cv02574
Defendant:
Kathy N. Waller, Beyond Meat, Inc., Bernhard Van Lengerich and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brink and Melvyn Klein
In re: William Davis, Jr.
as 20-6371
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PURDUE, MIKE EASLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Irizarry v. O'Neill et al
as 3:2020cv00334
Respondent:
Ned Lamont, Attorney General, Middletown Superior Court and others
Petitioner:
Fernando Irizarry
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
