Cases 51 - 60 of 389
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Respondent:
Zinc Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03080
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
HON. JOSEPH A. DICKSON
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF MONTANA, EX. REL., THE STATE OF KANSAS EX. REL., TIMOTHY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Preferred Care Developmental Centers of Mississippi, Inc. et al v. State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
as 4:2023cv00798
Debtor:
Lincoln Residential Center and Rolling Hills Developmental Center
Appellant:
Preferred Care Developmental Center of Mississippi, Inc doing business as Canton Manor and Preferred Care Development Center of Mississippi, Inc doing business as Delta Manor
Appellee:
State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
Not Classified By Court:
Case Admin Sup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK Case
Preferred Care Developmental Centers of Mississippi, Inc. et al v. State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
as 3:2023cv00486
Appellant:
Preferred Care Developmental Centers of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as Canton Manor, et al and Delta Manor
Appellee:
State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
In re: Google LLC
as 23-910
Petitioner:
Google, LLC
Respondent:
The State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner:
State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Florida v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 23-11644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, CANIZARES LAW GROUP LLC, CATHOLIC CHARITIES LEGAL SERVICES and others
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Innovation Law Lab
as 6:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
