Cases 51 - 60 of 365
State of Nebraska, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-3179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Nebraska, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Miguel Cardona, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Education and United States Department of Education
Appellant:
Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Americans for Prosperity Foundation and New Civil Liberties Alliance
State of Nebraska et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv01040
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Miguel Cardona and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee, et al v. Department of Education, et al
as 22-5807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, A.S., a minor, by Brandi Scarborough, her mother, C.F., a minor, by Sara Ford, her mother and others
Donald Trump v. USA
as 22-13005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, FOURTH AMENDMENT SCHOLAR, JOHN M. MITNICK and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
State of Arizona, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2854
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 22-2812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of West Virginia, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Director, Steven M. Dettelbach (formerly Gary M. Restaino)
Fulton County Special Purpose Grand Jury v. Lindsey Graham
as 22-12696
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FULTON COUNTY SPECIAL PURPOSE GRAND JURY
Defendant / Appellant:
LINDSEY GRAHAM, in his official capacity as United States Senator
Not Classified By Court:
DONALD B. AYER, JOHN FARMER, RENATO MARIOTTI and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Tennessee et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Thomas J Vilsack, Cindy Long and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Marcos-Chavela v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Susan Marcos-Chavela
Defendant:
State of Utah, State of South Carolina and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
