Cases 51 - 60 of 346
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00821
Plaintiff:
Rosario, Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lancaster et al v. Agilis Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Robert Lancaster and Maxwell Stinson
Defendant:
Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan LLC, Cyient Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Darlene Gibbs v. Michael Stinson
as 22-1017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARLENE GIBBS, STEPHANIE EDWARDS, GEORGE HENGLE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL STINSON, LINDA STINSON, 7HBF NO. 2 LTD. and others
Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al
as 3:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
David Granata, James Rowe, Stephen Dowe and others
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney, a Division of Raytheon Technologies Corporation, QuEST Global Services-NA, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tom Conroy, Christopher Novoa, Scott Prentiss and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Belcan LLC, Co-Conspirator, Does 1-50 and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Staffing Association
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Morris Beals, et al v. Countrymark Energy Resources,
as 21-6152
Plaintiff:
MORRIS W. BEALS and JONI BEALS
Intervenor:
CLEARPATH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and STINSON BROS. WELDING SERVICE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC
US v. Timothy Stinson
as 21-7556
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY STINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
