Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 771
Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46177
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Lucas County Children Services Board of Trustees, Board of Commissioners for Lucas County, Ohio and Mental Health & Recovery Services Board of Lucas County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Blackfeet Tribe of The Blackfeet Indian Reservation v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45749
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: The Blackfeet Tribe of The Blackfeet Indian Reservation and Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Barberton et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al
as 1:2018op45767
Plaintiff: Irving B. Sugerman, Brad Bryan, Valley Fire District and others
Defendant: Anda, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45580
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Lytton Band of Pomo Indians
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04326
Defendant: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and THE WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Petitioner: THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
In Re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Interested Party: THE KROGER CO and WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
City of Lake Charles v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al
as 1:2019op45449
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLC f/k/a Allergan, Inc., Richard S. Sackler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, Ins., et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 22-80116
Not Classified By Court: In re: HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND, PETER STALEY and others
Petitioner: GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., GILEAD HOLDINGS, LLC, GILEAD SCIENCES, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
WALGREEN CO. et al v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv06440
Plaintiff: WALGREEN CO. and KROGER SPECIALTY PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: CELGENE CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant: Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05822
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., Rite Aid Corporation, Hy-Vee, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?