Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Consolidation Coal Company v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1666
Plaintiff:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE and others
Danos et al v. BP America Production Company et al
as LAE/2:13-cv-03747
Plaintiff:
Jorey Danos , Frank Howell , James Morgan and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , BP America Production Company , BP p.l.c. and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. PCS Phosphate Company, Incorpo
as 13-1664
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc. v. Sutton Salvage, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Oil Re-Refining Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sutton Salvage, LLC, Mitchell's Mobile Mashing and Mitchell L. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Consolidation Coal Company v. Georgia Power Company
as 13-1617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Third Party Plaintiff:
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY, BABSON COLLEGE and others
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. Consolidation Coal Company
as 13-1603
Plaintiff:
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., Progress Energy Carolinas, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, AMERICAN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, TOWN OF BLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA and others
Third Party Defendant:
BARNES & POWELL ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC and others
Wells Fargo Captl Fin, L.L.C. v. Gordon Noble, et al
as 13-10468
Debtor:
In the Matter of: R.E. LOANS, L.L.C., R.E. FUTURE, L.L.C. and CAPITAL SALVAGE, a California Corporation
Appellant:
WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, L.L.C.
Appellee:
GORDON NOBLE, ARLENE DEA DEELEY, FREDRIC C. MENDES and others
Mac's Marina, Inc. et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01278
Plaintiff:
Mac's Marina, Inc. and Undertow Marine Towing & Salvage, Inc.,
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
