Cases 61 - 70 of 594
Aracely Gutierrez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3015
Petitioner:
ARACELY MONTOYA GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Montoya-Campos v. Garland
as 21-1425
Petitioner:
MILADY MONTOYA-CAMPOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Montoya et al v. RINEHART et al
as 1:2021cv24454
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Montoya and Alejandro Gomez
Defendant:
BRETT RINEHART, ENID STULZ, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
US Fresh Corp. v. Banana King Distributor LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10256
Plaintiff:
US Fresh Corp.
Defendant:
Banana King Distributor LLC and Eliecer Montoya
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Saavedra v. Montoya
as 1:2021cv05418
Petitioner:
Edgar Hernan Parra Saavedra
Respondent:
Alison Estefany jimene Montoya and Alison Esteffany Jimenez Montoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 - INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION REMEDIES
Montoya-Martinez v. Garland
as 21-9573
Petitioner:
SILVIA A. MONTOYA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Extiwuen Orozco-Montoya v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-71284
Petitioner:
EXTIWUEN OROZCO-MONTOYA
Respondent:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting Director of ICE and others
Brown v. McDonough
as 21-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANA BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, Secretary, US Department of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
ALFRED MONTOYA, TAMMY KRUEGER, MARY WALKER and others
USA v. Montoya-Balderrama
as 21-50853
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Antonio Montoya-Balderrama, also known as Antonio Montoya Jesus Balderrama
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
