Cases 61 - 70 of 110
Cheryl Deaver v. BBVA Compass Consulting, et al
as 13-80126
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CHERYL DEAVER
Defendant - Petitioner:
BBVA COMPASS CONSULTING AND BENEFITS, INC. and COMPASS BANK
Secure Axcess et al v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2013mc00104
Plaintiff:
Secure Axcess
Defendant:
Bank of America , Arvest Bank , Bank of the Ozarks and others
Petitioner:
RSA Security
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Compass Bank v. Adams et al
as 1:2012mc07471
Plaintiff:
Compass Bank
Defendant:
Chad Adams and Jodi Adams
In re: Montecito at Mirabel Developme, et al v. Compass Bank
as 12-17713
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MONTECITO AT MIRABEL DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Appellant:
MONTECITO AT MIRABEL DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
COMPASS BANK
In re: Weston Ranch Development, L.L., et al v. Compass Bank, et al
as 12-17715
Debtor:
In the Matter of: WESTON RANCH DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Appellant:
WESTON RANCH DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.
Appellee:
COMPASS BANK, DAVID M. REAVES, U.S. BANK NA and others
Compass Bank v. Adams et al
as 3:2012mc00400
Defendant:
Chad Adams and Jodi Adams
Plaintiff:
Compass Bank
Randy Williams v. BBVA Compass Bank, et al
as 12-20687
Debtor:
In the Matter of: POSITIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT
Appellant:
RANDY W WILLIAMS, Chapter 7 Trustee
Appellee:
BBVA COMPASS BANK, formerly known as Compass Bank, formerly known as First National Bank, PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO, SYNERIMAGES HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, L.L.C. and others
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv02350
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carole Ruth Smith and Harrison Earl Smith
Garnishee:
Bank of America NA , Compass Bank and Texans Credit Union
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
