Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 791
PACE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00607
Petitioner: SANDRA GILL PACE
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Raymond Gill
as 22-175
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Gill v. Garland
as 22-783
Petitioner: PIARA SINGH GILL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00608
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Trocano et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff: Alaina Trocano, Kathryn Gill, Tammy Gipp and others
Defendant: Centers for Disease Control & Prevention and Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. Tandingan P.T. P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01582
Defendant: Ilya Perloff, P.T., Inna Lyubronetskaya, Tandingan P.T. P.C. and others
Plaintiff: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
Cross Defendant: Ross A. Fialkov, D.C., P.C., Molnar Medical Services PC, Mill Medical P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Raymond Gill
as 22-118
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Gill v. OT Growth Partners LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00192
Plaintiff: Anna Gill
Defendant: OT Growth Partners LLC and Ultimate Fitness Group LLC doing business as OrangeTheory Fitness
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: Raymond Gill
as 22-116
Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?