Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 694
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16379
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY, GARY TALEWSKY and HARRY GARAVANIAN
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16368
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: JOHN FINN and LAURA TOWNSEND FORTMAN
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16373
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Alternators - Heavy Equipment Trucks
as 2:2015cv00707
Plaintiff: Rush Truck Centers of Alabama, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Compucom Systems Inc et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02948
Defendant: NEC Display Solutions of America Inc, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: CompuCom Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff: MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rush Truck Centers of Alabama, Inc. et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv14096
Plaintiff: Rush Truck Centers of Alabama, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv05875
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Neco Alliance LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05831
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Neco Alliance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05827
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, ABC Appliance, Inc. and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Irving Levine Automotive Distributors, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 2:2015cv13634
Plaintiff: Irving Levine Automotive Distributors, Inc.
Defendant: Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?