Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Hinton v. Naked Juice Company et al
as 8:2011cv03740
Plaintiff:
Kenn Hinton
Defendant:
Naked Juice Company and Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gina Park v. Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09677
Defendant:
Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc and Pepsico Inc
Plaintiff:
Gina Park
Christopher Evans v. Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09412
Defendant:
Does, Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc and Pepsico Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Evans
Natalie Pappas v. Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc et al
as 2:2011cv08276
Defendant:
Does, Naked Juice Co of Glendora Inc and PepsiCo Inc
Plaintiff:
Natalie Pappas
BULL DOG NEW YORK LLC v. PEPSICO, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06020
Plaintiff:
BULL DOG NEW YORK LLC
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. and PEPSI-COLA ADVERTISING AND MARKETING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Harold Brown et al v. Pepsico Inc et al
as 2:2010cv07367
Plaintiff:
Harold Brown, Morris Dickerson, Lee Oskar Levitin and others
Defendant:
Does, Pepsico Inc and TBWA CHIAT DAY LA
Werbel v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 4:2009cv04456
Plaintiff:
Roy Werbel
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
COCA-COLA V PEPSI-COLA
as 07-1559
Defendant-Appellee:
Pepsi-Cola Company and Pepsico, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Kansas Judicial, et al v. Stout, et al
as 06-3290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KANSAS JUDICIAL WATCH, CHARLES M. HART and ROBB RUMSEY
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKEL L. STOUT, in his official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, JENNIFER L. JONES, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, NANCY ANSTAETT, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, NATIONAL AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CAMPAIGN CONDUCT, COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
